|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Duo Roman
Warp Nomads
43
   |
Posted - 2017.05.23 16:13:14 -
[1] - Quote
Haile Korhal wrote: Unfortunately there is literally no way to test if this is true as you can't know where it's going before it gets there. No experimentation whatsoever can produce an answer on whether or not the other side of the wormhole spawns from your static.
There is an experiment you can make. It is very tedious and requires a bit of luck in terms that no other WH spawns, but it can be done:
- Roll all your connections, including your static.
- Don't warp to your static.
- Wait
- Wait more
- If no one warps to the new static, it will remain there, way beyond the 24 hours it was supposed to last.
Haile Korhal wrote: And while even CCP is vague on the subject (probably on purpose) they're the closest thing to fact we have for these mechanics.
Vague? Read it again and point out where is part that you think is "vague".
It is pretty clear to me. |
Duo Roman
Warp Nomads
43
|
Posted - 2017.05.23 20:08:34 -
[2] - Quote
Haile Korhal wrote:So if the K162 is never spawned the wormhole never decays? Well that's an interesting point of fact. If only we could see the numbers behind it and prove it. We've had a few wormholes last 72+ hours, but we had warped to them and through them in several cases. We filed bug reports every time they did though.
If the time the WH is supposed to despawn matches with downtime then strange things happen, like a new static may appear on the same spot, with the same signature name of the old one, but leading to a different system.
If in your case the 72+ hours WH leads to the same exact system, then it's a different bug I guess. |
Duo Roman
Warp Nomads
43
|
Posted - 2017.05.23 20:22:52 -
[3] - Quote
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:this is why people dumb enough to mine in WH will only warp to one belt at a time so as to keep any others around longer
Don't you think there are big corps mining with rorqual fleets, in closed wormholes? I honestly don't think its dumb, specially because WH mining stats don't show up in the montly economy report. |
Duo Roman
Warp Nomads
43
|
Posted - 2017.05.24 11:39:27 -
[4] - Quote
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:because it is far more lucrative to do in null its also safer. mining used to be an okay idea in WH when the sites were sigs. but now you have 0 warning if a cloaky fleet shows up. no probes no d-scan no nothing till you are tackled
Null mining is more lucrative, yes. But as safe as it may be in null, this knowledge of closing WHs can arguably make it safer in wormholes. |
Duo Roman
Warp Nomads
43
|
Posted - 2017.06.02 12:26:26 -
[5] - Quote
Klade Barbarus wrote:Sorry, I've read this thread, but I'm still not understanding what happens when a new static spawns (let's say, right after a roll) and you DON'T warp to it. Can someone elaborate?
You do understand, you just don't believe it. |
|
|
| |
|